This DCPost article got me thinking about how truly insignifigant Tim Kaine is as governor. His two choice issues, mandated pro-Kindergarden classes for all 4 year olds and open land purchases, were shot down without a fight.
Its amazing how useless he is. He's basically a veto pen, and thats it. The important players on the state level are all in the legislature, and the eyes are on McDonnell and Bolling as they size each other up for 2009. Of the budget just passed in the House,
All 36 House Democrats voted for the budget, which included several hundred million dollars for road projects. Several Democrats said Thursday that they are hoping Kaine's priorities will be restored during House and Senate negotiations.
Nobody even tried to fight for him, hoping something will come up in conference. Gov. Kaine shows no vision, no leadership, and no backbone. I have never seen him yet take a concrete position or speak out with the authority of his office on any of the major political problems facing the Commonwealth. On Transportation, Kaine has shown no courage in coming out for anything. We hear these noises, but Kaine is cowardly waiting for which shoe will drop, and then take action. Instead, he should be showing leadership and helping to guide the Assembly, cajole and even bully. But lead! And he won't, because he's too politically invested in keeping all the problems going. Kaine has basically sat around for for two years avoiding making any tough decisions, hoping to gain a majority with Republicans killing themselves. Kaine isn't up for any fights, and I don't know why. Perhaps he's thinking about sime random run for office in the future, I don't know. But on issues in which should lead, he doesn't becasue he's afraid of making the wrong move. We could have a broomstick with a tie on and stick it in the Executive Mansion and nobody would be the wiser.
Yes Gov. Kaine definitely matters just because he hold the ultimate power, the VETO pen.
I think you are correct that Kaine has shown absolutely NO leadership this year. Last year, I thought he made valiant attempt to get both sides together with his transportation solutions but as we can easily see, nothing happened. I think his tranportation package last year was better than the liberal Republican controlled senate with Potts and company. I am very suprised we have heard absolutely nothing from the governor this year.
Posted by: 10thdistrictrepublican | February 09, 2007 at 05:37 PM
Surprised? Kaine is clever. He is not going to commit himself, and will spend the fall bashing the GOP for what they did not do.
If no transporation plan passes, they bash on that. If a plan passes, kaine bashes for not going far enough.
Kaine is a backshooter who prefers the ambush to candid discussion. remember, this is the guy who got elected by saying he would not raise taxes, then was asking for new taxes before thanksgiving.
Posted by: bwana | February 09, 2007 at 09:16 PM
Its about leadership. While I don't agree with Mark Warner on much, at least he lead. Kaine is a follower, someone who perfers to let others hold his water for him. And I've heard that Warner and his closest advisors don't think much of Kaine. Perhaps nobody thought he would beat Jay Katzen in 2001, and thought McEachin would have defeated Jerry Kilgore? Have you also noticed that Warner isn't around Kaine much? I get the feeling Kaine was the succesor nobody in Warnerland wanted.
Posted by: Chris | February 09, 2007 at 09:29 PM
There is a famous saying: "When your opponents are shooting themselves, stay out of way."
The Republicans control the House and the Senate and it is their job to pass a transportation plan. Why should Kaine help lead this most merry band of hapless legislators out of the wilderness?
Posted by: | February 09, 2007 at 10:21 PM
I don't know Anon, maybe becasue he CAMPAIGNED that he would do just that!!!!! An look what is happeneing now? Seems like the GARepubs MAY come out with something, and what will Kaine do now? He took a giant risk.
My point is Kaine campaigned that he would solve the impasse and he has the office the bullhorn to do just that. Warner was able to get his (bad) ideas passed by asserting at least partisan leadership. If Kaine had have the balls that Saslaw or Moran have, Republicans would be in REAL trouble.
Posted by: Chris | February 09, 2007 at 10:52 PM
Kaine as "leader" was unable to bring about a compromise for transportation last year even though the Senate wanted to spend billions, and the house actually set aside hundreds of millions, for transportation.
That's a pretty sad commentary.
This year he's doing very little so far.
His biggest thing last year was reneging on his promise to support the Marriage amendment, and instead actively opposing it. It won by a large margin.
Posted by: charles | February 09, 2007 at 11:04 PM
Remember, right now Kaine has to do absolutely nothing since the "so-called" Republican lead senate are absolutely killing each other over this "compromise."
Why should Kaine stick his neck out and deal with this issue when he has loyal deputies such as Chichester and Potts to do the work for him? Remember last year Chichester and Potts were much more ambitious with the idea of increasing taxes than Kaines plan. I think Kaine is probably enjoying watching the very liberal senate shoot down the transportation plans. As long as their is no transportation plan, Tim Kaine and the Democrats still have their main campaign platform in place for NOVA in 2007.
Posted by: 10thdistrictrepublican | February 09, 2007 at 11:31 PM
One note of caution. In terms of lack of effectiveness, we probably we're all saying the same thing about Warner after the referendum was defeated and unfortunately we were proven wrong. On a different track, I have a question for the Democrats on pre-K education. If we are already funding pre-K for at risk kids, then why do we need to do it for all kids, esp. those in very affluent No. Va. Most of them are probably already in pre-K to begin with.
Posted by: George Templeton | February 10, 2007 at 01:54 AM
So you are saying that Kaine is all eyebrows and no backbone? LOL
Posted by: Isophorone | February 10, 2007 at 10:17 AM